Author: Artisanal Toad

Theology For Men of the West: Hypergamy

Artisanal Toad30 Comments

The Nature Of Women

In Genesis 3:16 we find the judgment of woman, by God:

To the woman He said,
“I will greatly multiply
Your pain in childbirth,
In pain you will bring forth children;
Yet your desire will be for your husband,
And he will rule over you.”

This passage has been the subject of much argument within the church, to the point that the translation is being changed. It’s pretty straightforward until you get to the word that’s translated as “desire.” Before we get to the real problem, let’s look at the word itself, which is only used three times in all of Scripture. The first is in the passage quoted above, the second is in Genesis 4:7

If you do well, will not your countenance be lifted up? And if you do not do well, sin is crouching at the door; and its desire is for you, but you must master it.”

Obviously, in that passage the meaning of the word desire is a desire to control or to conquer. The only other use of the word is in the Song of Solomon 7:10, in which the word desire is clearly used to mean sexual desire.

“I am my beloved’s, a nd his desire is for me.

So, in Genesis 3:16, what does that word “desire” mean?

The Fundamental Assumption Is The Problem

You can guess what happened, right? Everybody staked out a position on the word desire as meaning either a desire to control or a sexual desire because the fundamental assumption is the word has ONLY ONE MEANING. This is incorrect in this case because this isn’t an either-or choice. The observed nature of women demonstrates that the definition is both, as we shall see.
“Your desire shall be for your husband and he shall rule over you.”
The object of woman’s desire is for her man and “man” is defined as one who will “rule, have dominion, reign over you”.
Your desire shall be for [the man who rules over you]. The word translated as “rule over” is the Hebrew word mashal (Strong’s 4910), which is a verb. An active verb. What about the woman who has a man who does not rule over her? Is her desire for him? What about the woman who does not have a man? Does she have no desire for men?
[A woman’s] desire shall be for [the man who is fit to rule over her].
This puts it into an easy-to-understand form and allows us to go back and look at the word desire again, which raises the critical question: How does the woman know the man is fit to rule over her?
Every woman has an attraction point and her personal preferences are irrelevant because at some point she will be attracted to a man. What happens next? First, the woman wants to confirm the man’s fitness so she tests him. These tests are commonly known as “shit tests” or “fitness tests.” If she can conquer/control him he fails the test. If he blows through her tests and demonstrates his fitness to rule her, then her desire to conquer him is satisfied (temporarily) and her desire becomes sexual in nature.
  • Interest –> Man is Tested –> Man’s Fitness Proved –> Attraction
  • Interest –> Man is Tested –> Man Fails Tests –> All Attraction Dies
Fitness testing is ongoing. No matter how long the relationship lasts, there will always be fitness testing because the woman needs to know the man still has what it takes. Think of it as checking boundaries. One of the foundational Red Pill truths is all women really are like that. Your mother, your sister, your girlfriend or your wife. AWALT. Why? Because God said so. Don’t believe it? Go argue with Him.
What happens when a woman meets a man who is more fit to rule than her husband? That depends on whether her husband is meeting her needs and we’ll talk about that in a bit.
It has only been since 1960 that unrestrained hypergamy has been possible and it has only been apparent in the past few decades. Prior to that it was assumed by the tradition of long-held belief that women were not like that because there were numerous social restrictions and cultural mores that restrained women’s hypergamy. This is possibly the first time in all of history in which unrestrained hypergamy has become apparent to all, due to women’s ability to provide provisioning for themselves and control their fertility.

The Dark Side Of Hypergamy

What happens when the man does not pass her fitness tests? In the beginning, what little attraction she might have had for him dries up and dies on the spot. In an existing relationship if he lets himself lose control and starts failing her tests she will become frustrated and test him all the harder, hoping he can pass her tests. She is looking for her ruler and he’s not showing up. If he continually fails her tests she will eventually seethe with contempt for him. At this point the relationship is doomed.
When she encounters a man who displays the dominance her husband lacks, her desire will shift to that man regardless of the past, regardless of her supposed commitment and without regard for anyone’s feelings. That is the nature of hypergamy. In fact, unless the woman is so completely focused on her man (meaning he is the right man) that she’s completely uninterested in any other man, then under the right conditions she will cheat. So many men have been lied to all their lives about women that encountering the true nature of women blows their mind. There is a fantasy that says a woman needs time, she needs a relationship, she needs to be “in love” or she needs to feel secure before having sex. No. The truth is that it comes down to a simple formula:
The right man at the right time in the right place with the right line.
That’s all it takes. The right man is a man she finds highly attractive, far more attractive than the man she is with. The right place and the right time subjectively refer to her accountability. The right line is the one that passes her tests and indicates he is attracted to her. This is a matrix and each point is subjective depending on the values of the other points. For the man who is insanely attractive to her, she will take chances and risk getting caught. For less attractive men she has to have the time and place where she can achieve what she wants with him. She still has desires, just not enough to overcome all caution.
Let’s say she’s on a business trip out of town to a convention, staying in the convention center hotel. She’s away from home and everyone who knows her and could recognize her. Staying in a hotel room, no-one will know (or care) who she gets in bed with. No-one is keeping tabs on her and indeed, no-one can. In such a situation the man does not need to be all that attractive, just more attractive than what she already has. Add a little alcohol and inhibitions drop. So do the panties.
Anyone who thinks women don’t understand this is an idiot. Some women bind themselves with rules and boundaries in order to guard themselves because they know what they are really like, but such women are rare. Feminism works hard to convince women they should put themselves in positions where their hypergamy can wreak havoc. Women who restrain themselves and set boundaries are extremely rare.
I am convinced some women defend their lack of attraction to their husband by making themselves gross because they do not want to be tempted by an attractive man and thereby betray their husband and family. However, for every woman like that there are likely dozens of women who are not attracted to their husband and refuse to do the work of maintaining their attractiveness because they doesn’t think he deserves it. The number of women who dramatically lose weight and become more attractive following a divorce tends to prove it was voluntary on her part to become gross in the first place.
Again, the right man at the right time in the right place with the right line. That’s all it takes to trigger the hypergamy. Nothing else will matter because hypergamy doesn’t care. Relationship, marriage, kids, good reputation, friendships, none of it matters because hypergamy doesn’t care. And yes, all women are like that. The wisest man who ever lived had this to say on the subject (Ecclesiastes 7:28):

while I was still searching but not finding– I found one upright man among a thousand, but not one upright woman among them all.

All women are like that because God said so. Rollo Tomassi’s post “Hypergamy Doesn’t Care” illustrates this wonderfully:
  • Hypergamy doesn’t care about yesterday, only about today and tomorrow.
  • Hypergamy doesn’t care how great a Father you are to your kids.
  • Hypergamy doesn’t care about God or hell.
  • Hypergamy doesn’t care if you don’t understand what hypergamy is.
  • Hypergamy doesn’t care if you win the nobel peace prize, cure cancer, and put an end world hunger.
  • Hypergamy doesn’t care how ‘supportive’ you’ve always been of her decisions or if you identify as a ‘male feminist’.
  • Hypergamy doesn’t care about the sincerity of your religious convictions or aspirations of high purpose.
  • Hypergamy doesn’t care about those words that were said at your wedding.
  • Hypergamy doesn’t care about how you funded her going back to college to find a more rewarding career.
  • Hypergamy doesn’t care how great a guy you are for adopting the children she had with other men.
  • Hypergamy doesn’t care about you forgiving her “youthful indiscretions.”
  • Hypergamy doesn’t care about consequences.
  • Hypergamy doesn’t care about your magnanimity in assuming responsibility for her student loans and credit card debt after you’re married.
  • Hypergamy doesn’t care if “he was your best friend.”
  • Hypergamy doesn’t care about bringing her coffee in bed or how great a cook you are.
  • Hypergamy doesn´t care about your effort, it cares only about the results.
  • Hypergamy doesn’t care about how well you do your part of the household chores.
  • Hypergamy doesn’t care about how much her family or friends like you.
  • Hypergamy doesn’t care if you think you’re a “Good” guy or about how convincing your argument is for your sense of honor.
  • Hypergamy doesn’t care whether the children are biologically yours or not.
  • Hypergamy doesn’t care if “she was drunk, he was cute, and one thing led to another,..”
  • Hypergamy doesn’t care how sweet, funny or intellectual you are.
  • Hypergamy doesn’t care if you “never saw it coming.”
Hypergamy is the nature of women because God caused it to be this way. Anyone who opens their eyes and looks around can see that becoming a Christian doesn’t make God’s judgement on women go away any more than it makes a banged up slut suddenly becomes a virgin again. It is wise to understand the nature of women before making a commitment because the second biggest commitment you can possibly make is choosing a wife (the biggest is choosing to commit yourself to the Lord). Proverbs 18:22 says:

He who finds a wife finds a good thing and obtains favor from the Lord.

Scripture also contains many warnings about women, such as this from Proverbs 25:24.

It is better to live in a corner of the roof t han in a house shared with a contentious woman.

And a more ominous one from Proverbs 30:20…

This is the way of an adulterous woman:
She eats and wipes her mouth,
And says, “I have done no wrong.”

Because hypergamy doesn’t care. “I have done no wrong” sums it up nicely.
A woman’s desire is for a man who is fit to rule her, a man who rules over her. That is the essence of hypergamy and it behooves men to understand that. Men, be fit to rule.

Theology For Men of the West: Doctrine of Demons

Artisanal Toad17 Comments
In the last post we saw that God’s wrath on the West came in the form of removing His influence and restraint. God didn’t cause bad things to happen, He simply stopped restraining people from following their evil desires. The reason for this was modern idolatry- the theory of evolution. Because they knew God and turned their backs to Him, claiming He wasn’t the Creator because we’d evolved by mere chance… God decided to stop helping everyone and removed His restraining influence. He turned them over to their evil desires.

Forbidding Marriage

Another aspect of this is found in a prophesy that Paul made in 1st Timothy 4:1-5, wherein evil things happen because of the doctrine of demons taught by deceitful spirits and evil men. Specifically, we’re looking at the first part of verse 3 (underlined):

“But the Spirit explicitly says that in later times some will fall away from the faith, paying attention to deceitful spirits and doctrines of demons, by means of the hypocrisy of liars seared in their own conscience as with a branding iron,men who forbid marriage…”

The word translated as “forbid” is kóluó (Strong’s 2967). Definition: I prevent, debar, hinder; with infin: from doing so and so. The English definition of the word “debar” is exclude or prohibit (someone) officially from doing something.
The “something” being forbidden is marriage, which was designed by God. We have already covered the fact that “modern marriage” is not the marriage that God designed. Why would it be the doctrine of demons to prevent or hinder marriage?
The depraved passion of feminism has caused women to give up the natural function of being a wife and mother under the authority of her husband for the unnatural, which is the rejection of men and any form of marriage at all. I would certainly call feminism both a depraved passion as well as a doctrine of demons that excludes and hinders marriage. After all, the feminists told us “a woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle.”
The teaching that “sex doesn’t make you married” produced the widespread promiscuity of today’s culture, because the official position of the churchians is sex with a virgin does not create a marriage. The churchians teach that it’s only “premarital sex” and God will forgive them, so what’s the point of “saving yourself” for marriage? They don’t, which sets the women up as lifelong adulteresses.
This is the way of Baalam, placing a stumbling block before God’s people. The result of this is within the church at least 80% of the people who think they are married are not, they are living together in adultery. Why does the church have no power? Because they are in sin. Who teaches the doctrines of feminism and forbidding marriage? Feminist, churchian leaders cause the people to hear the lies,

“the hypocrisy of liars seared in their own conscience as with a branding iron”

According to Genesis 2:24, when the eligible virgin is penetrated by the man, she is married with that act. Yet, today the marriage that results is “forbidden” by modern churchian leadership, who claim that no such marriage exists because sex does not create a marriage. The Holy Spirit prophesied through Paul this would happen in 1st Timothy 4:3. The result of this doctrine of demons is widespread adultery both in and outside the church. The so-called “epidemic of divorce” does not exist because the vast, vast majority of such “divorces” do not end marriages, they end adulterous unions.
Of course, one could always view the “forbid marriage” in the traditional light of the RCC-Prot fight, that Catholic priests are not allowed to be married. For multiple reasons such as the advice of the Apostle Paul and the teaching of Jesus, this is a poor second choice in the matter. Why would it be a doctrine of demons when Paul said he wished others were as he was, celibate in order to focus his energy on the Kingdom of the Lord?
Some might say this represents a Christian MGTOW teaching, but Churchianity and MGTOW are completely incompatible. Paul’s prophecy was to the church, about some falling away from the faith because of these teachings. However, there is another aspect to this forbidding of marriage.

The Real Reason For Attacks On Marriage

In modern times, who are the enemies of the family? First and foremost must be the depraved passion of feminism. Second, we have churchians and their depraved marital doctrines of ‘servant leadership’ and ‘mutual submission’ that destroy marriages. Feminism is completely in control of the government, which it uses as a tool to destroy families with the blessing of the churchians.
Why is the family such a target for destruction? The simple answer is that in general, individuals become Christians prior to puberty based on the teaching and example of their parents. Church growth follows population growth because it is rare for an adult who is set in their ways to repent and become a Christian. Guess what? It is the father who determines whether the children become members of the church, not the mothers. A study proving this was done in 1994 and published in 2000, but hardly anyone has heard of it. It is not available online (surprise) but but can be purchased.
The most critical information that came out of that study involves the impact of the father’s religious behavior on the children. The following table lays out the religious attendance practice of adult children according to the attendance practice of their parents. Regular attendance, irregular attendance and no attendance, in percentages (%).
Parents Parents Children Children Children Children
Father Mother Regular Irregular None Total
Regular Regular 32.8 41.4 25.8 100.0
Regular Irregular 37.7 37.6 24.7 100.0
Regular None 44.2 22.4 33.4 100.0
Irregular Regular 3.4 58.6 38.0 100.0
Irregular Irregular 7.8 60.8 31.4 100.0
Irregular None 25.4 22.8 51.8 100.0
None Regular 1.5 37.4 61.1 100.0
None Irregular 2.3 37.8 59.9 100.0
None None 4.6 14.7 80.7 100.0
Let’s red-pill this and look at the numbers. We assume the children will attend church as adults because they have become Christians as children.
  • A devout father has the greatest impact on the children regardless of his wife’s behavior and in terms of regular attendance of the children as adults, this occurs most frequently when the wife is not in attendance at all.
  • A father who has only irregular attendance has only a negligible impact on the regular attendance of the children unless the wife is not in attendance at all. The adult children will generally tend to mirror his irregular attendance.
  • Remove the father and regardless of the mothers attendance, the children will at best only attend church irregularly as adults and the vast majority of the children will be lost to the church.

Forbidding Polygyny

The incredible pressure to destroy families and get fathers out of the children’s lives is explained with this information, because destroying the family is the key to destroying the church. Which brings us to a fascinating point: When it comes to the issue of “forbid marriage” it seems polygyny is the keystone. Let’s look at why Satan is opposed to it so much.
We know that Satan does not work against himself. The central burning question is why feminists and churchians both hate the idea of polygyny with such a passion. Why, at every turn, is polygyny opposed with such determination and ferocity? Why do the homosexuals oppose it? Why does virtually every player on the field oppose it?
Let’s look at this from the opposite side: why do churchians, feminists, homosexuals and virtually all enemies of the family espouse the doctrine of strict monogamy? If polygyny was so bad and evil as all the little churchians say, why is it that Satan’s hard-hitters are so opposed to it?
  • Socially imposed monogamy is a structure designed to fail because it gives women a monopoly by removing the threat of competition. Strict monogamy removes accountability from women.
  • Social acceptance of multiple wives redefines marriage as patriarchal instead of feminist (monogamous) marriage. With the acceptance that men may legitimately have more than one wife, there is no longer “monogamy” or “polygyny” but only marriage. Some have multiple wives, the vast majority have only one, but there is always the possibility a second wife could be added. Women no longer have a monopoly.
  • Only high-value men can achieve a polygynous marriage, but such a marriage ensures they are disproportionately represented in the number of their offspring compared to men with only one wife.
  • Multiple wives is the death-blow to feminism because it emphasizes the separate and distinct standards of sexual morality for men and women. Men and women are not equal.
  • High-value men with multiple wives are an example for men to strive for because the structure of a polygynous marriage make the husband more dominant and the wives more feminine if the man is capable of handling more than one wife.

Objections: Mormons and Islam

This should be obvious. The Satanic goal is the destruction of the church so the intermediate objective is the destruction of Christian families. Opposition to patriarchal marriage needs a boogy-man, which comes in the form of renegade Mormons (FLDS) and Islam. Both have three central characteristics to the marriages, the first of which is the idea that all men should have more than one wife. History shows us that in societies that permitted polygyny, very few men had more than one wife. The study of Game informs us that only a small percentage of men are high-value (attractive) enough to garner the serious attention of multiple women. The result of this “all men should be poly” attitude creates two characteristics in their marriages.
Child brides. There reason both groups have a tendency toward child brides, which is that most men are not of sufficiently high value for adult women to willingly choose to share them. The prepubescent or barely pubescent girls are married off to adult men before they have the maturity and strength of character to reject them.
Disposable sons. In the FLDS communities, these disposable sons become the “lost boys” who are not up to par and thus discarded. Ejected from the community to make a life somewhere else because there will not be enough women for them to have even one wife. In the Islamic world, the sons are sent off to jihad. The appeal of strapping on a suicide vest to get a quick entry into paradise and 72 virgins must hold some appeal to these men who have no hope of getting a wife in this life.
The combination of these characteristics produces dysfunctional marriages and social conflict. Churchians point to the problems with such marriages in the FLDS and Muslim communities as if the form of marriage is at fault. We know there is nothing wrong with the form of marriage because God designed it. Yet, the form of the marriage is tarred with the brush of abuse within the context of Mormonism and Islam.
The result is God’s design for marriage is rejected by Christians as being a characteristic of the Godless heathens, leaving the Christians with the churchian feminist marriage of enforced monopoly for women. Nobody every said demons were stupid…

Theology For Men of the West: God’s Wrath

Artisanal Toad7 Comments

A Moment of Reflection On God’s Blessings and Curses

Chapter 26 of Leviticus and Chapter 28 of Deuteronomy tell us that the Lord blesses and curses nations. While that was written specifically to Israel, we can also consider that the United States was set up as a Christian Nation. We also have the evidence that God judged other nations for their sins.
If the nation listens to the voice of the Lord to observe and do all His commandments and walk in His ways, going astray neither to the left hand or to the right; and if the nation does not go after other gods to serve them, then God will give these blessings (this is not the complete list).
  • You will be blessed in the cities and in the fields.
  • Blessed shall be the offspring of your body and the produce of your ground
  • the offspring of your beasts, the increase of your herd and the young of your flock.
  • Blessed shall be the your fruit basket and mixing bowl, your storehouses shall be full.
  • You will be blessed when you come in and when you go out.
  • You will be blessed in all you undertake
  • Your land will be abundantly fertile and productive
  • The heavens will give you rain in due season in all your land
  • You will be prosperous in goods in children in stock and in crops in all the land
  • All nations will be afraid of you
  • You will have complete victory over all your enemies
However, if the nation does NOT listen to the voice of the Lord to observe and do all His commandments and walk in His ways, and if the nation goes after other gods to serve them, there are fifteen curses for disobedience (condensed).
You will be cursed in the city and in the field. Your baskets and storehouses will be cursed. Your children and crops will be cursed. Your herds and flocks will not increase. You will be cursed when you come in and cursed when you go out. God will send these curses on you and send vexation and rebukes. You will fail in all that you do and you will be destroyed. You will quickly perish.
And if the people do not turn to the Lord, then there are thirty more curses in addition to the first fifteen. Worse curses, because at this point God will turn His back on the nation.
If the people still refuse to turn to the Lord, there are another forty-one curses that get even worse because instead of just turning His back on the nation, God will actively strive against that nation.
What are the most often cited reasons for nations being destroyed?
  • Idolatry (spiritual adultery, ungratefulness)
  • Adultery (physical idolatry, covetousness)
  • Sexual immorality (male homosexuality)
  • Child sacrifice (murder, idolatry, polluting the land with blood)
  • Disobedience of the Lord’s commandments (selfishness, wickedness)
To snatch a line from Don Draper, I’m not here to tell you about Jesus. You either have him in your heart or you don’t. I can and occasionally I do share the Gospel, but that isn’t the purpose of this blog. Individuals get saved through faith in Christ and get judged by Him when the time comes. Those who don’t have their name written in the Book of Life get judged at the White Throne. There is a third judgment that Christians won’t be subject to, which is the separation of the sheep and the goats, but that’s another story.
The point is nations are judged according to their obedience to God’s Laws and the general morality of the nation according to their generation. For individuals it is given that they live, die and then receive judgment. For nations it’s a different matter because God judges nations in an ongoing process as they choose to obey or disobey Him. After showing Abraham the land of Caanan, God told him that his descendants would be enslaved and oppressed for 400 years and after that they would return and take over the land, but they had to wait. (Genesis 15:15-16)

 

for the iniquity of the Amorite is not yet complete

 

There comes a point at which God will wipe out nations.

The west is currently experiencing the wrath of God.

Romans 1:18-32 is a prophesy aimed at the West in our times. There are multiple references that place this prophesy into modern times, but the point that puts this on a timeline is in verse 27, describing the male homosexuals who violated God’s Law and received the due penalty in their own bodies. The penalty for male homosexuality is death. That places this prophesy right at 1980 on the timeline with the advent of AIDS.
What was the offense that caused God to pour out His wrath on the West? “men who suppress the truth in unrighteousness”. Based on his observations in the Galapagos Islands, in 1859 Charles Darwin had a book published called “On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life”. This book became the foundation of a new religion called evolution, which sought to displace God.
This theory held that instead of God creating the Heavens and the Earth and everything upon it, all life had “evolved” out of a primordial soup and God had no hand in it. That is the general theory of evolution, which is complete and utter bullshit. There is another portion of evolutionary theory that is in line with Darwin’s observations, which is the adaptation of species through natural selection over time. While natural selection is both real and provable, it was the general theory of evolution that was used to attack Christianity and God.
It’s probably wise at this point to make the observation that women achieved suffrage in 1920 and became part of the body politic. Notice that this is the point at which everything began going downhill in the West as the elected officials dealt with the change to the character of the electorate.
By 1925 the State of Tennessee had passed the Butler Act, making it illegal to teach evolution. Obviously teachers in schools were teaching evolution. As a publicity stunt some attorneys (the drugstore conspiracy) arranged an arrest and trial which became widely known as the Scopes Monkey Trial. This garnered a great deal of attention to the subject of evolution and the gremlins continued to toil away. Significant events occurred, a stock market crash, followed by a worldwide depression, followed by World War II.
In the aftermath of World War II, the result of the GI Bill was a dramatic expansion of colleges and universities. Between 1945 and 1965 there was an 8-fold increase in the number of seats available in colleges. Unfortunately, good college professors are a rare breed and plenty of substandard individuals were allowed in. By the end of the 1950’s evolution was enthroned as fact and absolute morality was thrown out the window in favor of “situational ethics” or “situational morality”.

 

For even though they knew God, they did not honor Him as God or give thanks, but they became futile in their speculations, and their foolish heart was darkened. Professing to be wise, they became fools, and exchanged the glory of the incorruptible God for an image in the form of corruptible man and of birds and four-footed animals and crawling creatures.

 

41Zml1z9EfL._SY355_
Can there be any greater symbol of the rejection of God in favor of evolution than the “Darwin Fish” symbol? From God’s perspective, what else could it be?
What was God’s response? The Wrath of God was poured out and He removed His restraining spirit and “gave them over”. If you turn your back on God often enough, He will turn His back on you.

IMPURITY

 

Therefore God gave them over in the lusts of their hearts to impurity, so that their bodies would be dishonored among them. For they exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen.

 

First came the impurity, the uncleanness that caused them to dishonor their bodies. What did the Apostle Paul say? “Flee immorality. Every other sin that a man commits is outside the body, but the immoral man sins against his own body. ” We need to keep a few things in mind:
  • The virgin is married to the man she gives her virginity to.
  • After that, sex with any other man is a case of adultery.
  • Churchians pushed the doctrine that sex does NOT make you married.
  • Girls are taught God forgives “premarital sex”, that virginity is worthless.
  • An adultery epidemic resulted both inside and outside the church.
First there was the trauma of the depression, followed by World War II and the mobilization of women into the workforce. Women had been empowered by suffrage and now were gaining economic independence. Many did not want to return home when the war was over. There was a great deal of societal movement in the late 1940’s and the 1950’s had the Korean War, the cold war and fears about the bomb. With the manufacturing base of the rest of the world destroyed America was having a “golden age” but things were changing.
The oldest data I could find at the CDC indicated that for those first married between 1960 and 1964, 52.6% of white women were virgins at the time of their first marriage (48.3% of all women were virgins). The median age of marriage in 1960 was 20.3 years of age and this does not tell us what percentage of these girls officially married the man who got their virginity. Assuming that a good percentage of the women who were not virgins when they officially married had given their virginity to their fiance, it is not unreasonable to suppose that the percentage of white women who were legitimately married to their official husband was 60% in 1960.
Which means 40% of the “marriages” in 1960 were adulterous unions with a dress, a ceremony and a cake. Things only got worse after that. The 1960’s marked a sea-change of attitudes in the West about sexual morality specifically and morality in general as people rejected God. While “The Pill” was introduced in 1957 for women with severe menstrual disorders and then approved for contraceptive use in 1960 after so many women developed severe menstrual disorders. 1960 marks the year female hypergamy was finally set free. I don’t know who created this graph, but it speaks volumes.
What did widespread divorce produce? Broken families and children being raised in households in which their father was absent. What was one of the predictors of male homosexuality back when the APA classified it as a pathology? Being raised in a female-dominated household with no father around.

DEGRADING PASSIONS

The generation given over to impurity was from 1945 to 1972. In 1972 several significant events occurred, one being the closure of the Gold window by Nixon, which destroyed the Bretton Wood accords and made the US dollar a fiat currency. Another was the fact that while the Roe v Wade decision was not handed down until the following year, Roe v Wade was decided in 1972 and Molech worship was legally enshrined in the West. Finally, given the length of time it takes for an HIV infection to progress to AIDS symptoms and death (10-15 years), the year of 1972 is about when the transmission of HIV really took off.

 

For this reason God gave them over to degrading passions; for their women exchanged the natural function for that which is unnatural, and in the same way also the men abandoned the natural function of the woman and burned in their desire toward one another, men with men committing indecent acts and receiving in their own persons the due penalty of their error.

 

Observe two things about that passage. It was God that gave them over to degrading passions, causing the women to exchange the “natural function” for the unnatural (that which is “against nature”). I believe the degrading passion of the women is feminism. The women rejected men as fathers and husbands in authority over them, which was the reason women were created. Woman was created from man, for man, to be used by man as a helper to accomplish his mission.
The men likewise rejected the natural function of women and rejected fatherhood and marriage in favor of male homosexuality, for which they got the due penalty in their own bodies. The penalty for male homosexuality is death and we know that 1981 was when AIDS was officially “discovered” but the HIV infections had obviously been germinating during the 1970’s. The Second generation ran from 1973 until 2001. In this generation we saw the evolution of feminism and the acceptance and promotion of homosexuality.
Did they turn back to God and repent of their evil ways? No. The stage has been set and once again God gave them over, this time to a depraved mind.

DEPRAVED MINDS

 

And just as they did not see fit to acknowledge God any longer, God gave them over to a depraved mind, to do those things which are not proper, being filled with all unrighteousness, wickedness, greed, evil; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, malice; they are gossips, slanderers, haters of God, insolent, arrogant, boastful, inventors of evil, disobedient to parents, without understanding, untrustworthy, unloving, unmerciful; and although they know the ordinance of God, that those who practice such things are worthy of death, they not only do the same, but also give hearty approval to those who practice them.

 

It was 9/11 that marked the turning point as those with depraved minds seized power. Some 16 years later, what do we have? Look around. From pedophiles everywhere to government officials inviting foreign invaders into the country. What has pizzagate taught us? Just how pervasive the evil really is by how many people in power support and defend pedophiles.

 

those who practice such things are worthy of death, they not only do the same, but also give hearty approval to those who practice them

 

Generations

If the generations are calculated correctly at roughly 28 years, then we are only twelve years from the end of this generation at roughly 2029.

Theology For Men of the West: Leaders Are Responsible

Artisanal Toad20 Comments

What Moses Should Have Done With The Leaders
The story that is told in Numbers 25 is one of the most politically explosive lessons in all of the Bible. The reason is simple: God held the leaders responsible for the sins of the people.
As we saw in a previous post, Balack took the advice of Baalam and sent the young women into the camp. They invited the people (men) to the sacrifices to their gods. The men went with them, ate and bowed down and thus were joined to Baal of Peor. God was angry with Israel so He turned to Moses.

The Lord said to Moses, “Take all the leaders of the people and execute them in broad daylight before the Lord, so that the fierce anger of the Lord may turn away from Israel.”

Seems pretty straight-forward, right? Obviously God is holding the leaders responsible for what was happening, so we’d expect to read that Moses killed them. Right? Well, no, he didn’t. He refused to obey God and sided with his fellow leaders.

So Moses said to the judges of Israel, “Each of you slay his men who have joined themselves to Baal of Peor.”

Those judges were the very men Moses was supposed to have executed, had he chosen to obey the Lord. So, the wrong people are now being executed, but we don’t get a casualty figure on that. Because they’re just little people and they don’t count. They’re not leaders. And God’s anger really burned against Israel so He sent a plague into the camp and the people started dropping like flies.
Then, Zimri, one of the chief princes of the tribe of Simeon (making him one of those who should have been executed) came strolling into the camp with a wench named Cozbi on his arm. Cozbi was the daughter of Zur, who God described as the leader of Midian. So, one of the high-ranking leaders of the tribe of Simeon walks into camp with a Midianite princess on his arm and they stroll right past the tent of meeting where Moses and the congregation were weeping at the doorway of the tent. Why were they weeping? Because of the plague that was killing them.
Keep in mind, Zimri had to have been involved with having the men of the tribe of Simeon killed for doing what he was about to do. And he knew (or should have known) that there was a reason a plague was sweeping through the camp killing people. With that in mind, picture Zimri and Cozbi strolling past the congregation and Moses in plain sight of everyone on their way to Zimri’s tent for, um… some tea. Yes. Tea for two.

Are The Leaders Above the Law?

Obviously Zimri thought he was above the Law as he and his hoochie-mamma walked to his tent, oblivious to everything surrounding them. Horniness has a way of doing that. But one man, Phineas the son of Eleazar, the son of Aaron the High Priest, was zealous for the Lord and he saw what was happening and took action.

he arose from the midst of the congregation and took a spear in his hand, and he went after the man of Israel into the tent and pierced both of them through, the man of Israel and the woman, through the body.

Tradition has it that it only took one thrust of the spear to get both of them, but he did get them. And they died. Because he killed them. With a spear. And obviously Phineas somehow turned into a religious radical and killed a government official without a trial or anything like that, which was murder… well, obviously… and that’s probably what some were thinking back then too. And spear control! There ought to be spear control! But very quickly none of that mattered because God stepped in. First, He stopped the plague that was going through the camp. The death toll was 24,000 dead in one day.
Then God spoke to Moses.

“Phinehas the son of Eleazar, the son of Aaron the priest, has turned away My wrath from the sons of Israel in that he was jealous with My jealousy among them, so that I did not destroy the sons of Israel in My jealousy. Therefore say, ‘Behold, I give him My covenant of peace; and it shall be for him and his descendants after him, a covenant of a perpetual priesthood, because he was jealous for his God and made atonement for the sons of Israel.’”

That is the 4th Priesthood of the Bible. What do Phineas Priests do? They’re jealous for God’s Law and they execute justice on untouchable leaders who think they’re above the Law. So, go ahead and start calling yourself a Phineas Priest and see how fast the FBI is all over you. Or worse, setting you up as a pasty in their next false-flag op. Because you better believe that nobody in a position of leadership wants to hear that they’re really going to be held responsible. They’re like Moses and just want to kill your sorry ass.
But God wasn’t done. Now it was time to deal with the Midianites and we learn more.

Then the Lord spoke to Moses, saying, “Be hostile to the Midianites and strike them; for they have been hostile to you with their tricks, with which they have deceived you in the affair of Peor and in the affair of Cozbi, the daughter of the leader of Midian, their sister who was slain on the day of the plague because of Peor.”

Look at what God is saying! He KNEW the people were being manipulated and the leaders should have caught what was happening and put a stop to it. But they didn’t. And God held them responsible for that. And when one man decided he wasn’t going to allow God to be dishonored that way and killed one of the leaders and some visiting royalty… God gave him a covenant of peace for him and his descendants after him… a covenant of a perpetual priesthood. The Phineas Priesthood. And if God said it was perpetual, that means the Phineas Priests are still around. Today.
Lesson Learned: The leaders are responsible when the people are led astray. That’s about to be very important.

Theology For Men of the West: The Way of Baalam

Artisanal Toad16 Comments

The Current State Of Western Civilization- Built On Sand

Why Should Men of the West Care About This?

The simple answer is because God does. Regardless of political ideology, without God the structure will fall. There is this idea that Western Civilization is founded on Christianity. I would phrase that in terms of obedience to God, because as the Lord said in Matthew 7:21-29

“Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father who is in heavenwill enter. Many will say to Me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in Your name, and in Your name cast out demons, and in Your name perform many miracles?’ And then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness.’
Th erefore
Everyone who hears these words of Mine and acts on them, may be compared to a wise man who built his house on the rock. And the rain fell, and the floods came, and the winds blew and slammed against that house; and yet it did not fall, for it had been founded on the rock. Everyone who hears these words of Mine and does not act on them, will be like a foolish man who built his house on the sand. The rain fell, and the floods came, and the winds blew and slammed against that house; and it fell—and great was its fall.” When Jesus had finished these words, the crowds were amazed at His teaching; for He was teaching them as one having authority, and not as their scribes. (Matthew 7:21-29, emphasis added)

It was hearing the Word of God and acting on it that caused the West to be great, because God blesses those nations who honor Him and curses those nations who do not. Where God has spoken man is to be silent and obey. The problem is there are those of Satan who do not want God’s people to obey and they have infested the church since the beginning.

Betrayed From Within

First we see the testimony of Peter, at 2nd Peter 2.

But false prophets also arose among the people, just as there will also be false teachers among you, who will secretly introduce destructive heresies, even denying the Master who bought them, bringing swift destruction upon themselves. (2nd Peter 2:1)
forsaking the right way, they have gone astray, having followed the way of Balaam, the son of Beor, who loved the wages of unrighteousness (2nd Peter 2:15)

Jesus had a word for these false teachers, He called them “Nicolaitans” and He hated their deeds.

But I have a few things against you, because you have there some who hold the teaching of Balaam, who kept teaching Balak to put a stumbling block before the sons of Israel, to eat things sacrificed to idols and to commit acts of immorality. So you also have some who in the same way hold the teaching of the Nicolaitans. (Revelation 2:14-15)

The Nicolaitans are the same as those who hold to the teaching of Baalam and their followers today are churchians. The question, then, is what did Baalam teach? That, as it turns out, is critical information for anyone trying to rebuild Western Civilization.
Before Israel went into the Land of Caanan, they were traveling through the land. God was with them and they kicked some serious ass on the Amorites. The Midianite king of Moab, Balak, decided to send for the prophet Baalam to come curse Israel for him. He said:

“… please come, curse this people for me since they are too mighty for me; perhaps I may be able to defeat them and drive them out of the land. For I know that he whom you bless is blessed, and he whom you curse is cursed.”

In Chapter 23 and 24 we see Baalam tried to curse Israel 3 times and each time he gave Israel a blessing instead, because God would not allow them to be cursed. In fact, the third time he made one of the greatest prophesies of the coming of Christ found in Scripture.

“I see him, but not now; I behold him, but not near; A star shall come forth from Jacob, A scepter shall rise from Israel”Numbers 24:17

What was not recorded at the time is after blessing Israel the third time, sometime later Baalam went to Balak and told him how to defeat the Israelites. He wanted to earn his fee. With God on their side Israel could not be defeated, so the trick was to alienate them from God by causing them to violate God’s commands. We see the result in Numbers 25.

While Israel remained at Shittim, the people began to play the harlot with the daughters of Moab. For they invited the people to the sacrifices of their gods, and the people ate and bowed down to their gods. So Israel joined themselves to Baal of Peor, and the Lord was angry against Israel. Numbers 25:1

There is so much exegetical goodness there… but instead of writing a book a concise explanation is more appropriate.
  • Baalam told Balak to send young women into the Israelite camp and lure the men into committing idolatry (Baal was a fertility god, remember?) by bowing down to the Baal of Peor.
  • Nowhere does the text say the men were banging these women, it says the women invited them, the people attended the sacrifices and then ate the meat sacrificed to the foreign gods. (There is an argument it was only the men, I won’t deal with that here)
  • The people ate the meat sacrificed to the foreign gods, thereby participating in the ceremony. In doing so they bowed down to the Baal of Peor.
  • And the anger of the Lord burned against Israel because they bowed down to the Baal of Peor. After all He’d done for them? And all it took was a bit of T&A?
NB. Churchians focus on the sexual immorality characterized by the word “zanah” that is translated as “play the harlot” in verse one. The word “zanah” is defined as idolatry as well as some sexual immorality and in this case refers to the combination of idolatry and (to some extent) sexual immorality.
So, now that the anger of the Lord burned against Israel, what happened? This is where the story got really interesting but I’ll have to address another post just to that subject. The simple answer is Moses refused to obey God, so God killed 24,000 of the people and finally one guy manned up and fixed things. As a result God created a new priesthood and this story has been one of the most historically explosive passages in all of Scripture.
Why were Sodom and Gomorrah destroyed? Churchians claim it was because of all the homosexuality, but Scripture says they “had arrogance, abundant food and careless ease, but she did not help the poor and needy. Thus they were haughty and committed abominations before Me.” The male homosexuality was called an abomination by God, but notice that it came last on the list after the arrogance, selfishness and haughtiness. Why did God command Israel to wipe out every man, woman and child of the Caananites? Because of they practiced idolatry, incest, adultery, child sacrifice, male homosexuality and bestiality.
Lesson Learned: God takes an active hand in the success or failure of nations based on what they choose to do. And the way of Baalam? God’s people can be defeated by alienating them from God. How?

Put a Stumbling Block In Front of God’s People

God demands obedience. The way to get God angry with His own people is to get God’s people to violate God’s commandments. To cause them to stumble. Which is exactly what Baalam taught Balak, to combine sex and idolatry and sell it to the people as “New!” and “Exciting!”. The question is how the churchians do this today. That was easy because Satan plays a long game and this was put in place over the course of centuries.
  • Sexual immorality: The churchians threw out God’s standards of sexual morality and replaced it with a combination of Pagan belief, Stoic philosophy and Roman Law. The doctrine of “Sex does not make you married, you must have a ceremony!” gave us an epidemic of adultery within the church.
  • Idolatry: The most sophisticated form of idolatry today is teaching that evolution is fact, which denies that God is the Creator… and denies that He is even God at all. How many so-called “Christians” today will claim God created the Heavens and the Earth according to the record of Genesis? How many reject the general theory of evolution as a lie?
  • Teaching Lies: The heart of the clerical hierarchy system was only the clergy had the authority to explain what the Bible said and what it meant. They demanded obedience to their teachings and for centuries killed people that rejected their false teaching.

The Nicolaitan and Churchian Mess

The history of the church indicates the Nicolaitans won, instituted a clerical caste of priests and lorded it over their fellow Christians. The leaders of the church claimed they had the authority to make up their own rules and claimed Christ gave them this power. They claimed not all the rules were written down and their tradition must be obeyed. They cite John 21:25 as their support:

And there are also many other things which Jesus did, which if they *were written in detail, I suppose that even the world itself *would not contain the books that *would be written.

The second was a naked grasp of authority based on their self-serving interpretation of what Jesus said at Matthew 16:17-19

And Jesus said to him, “Blessed are you, Simon Barjona, because flesh and blood did not reveal this to you, but My Father who is in heaven. I also say to you that you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build My church; and the gates of Hades will not overpower it. I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven; and whatever you bind on earth shall have been bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall have been loosed in heaven.” (emphasis added)

Binding and loosing. Where else have we seen that? Jesus was speaking to His disciples and said:

“If your brother sins, go and show him his fault in private; if he listens to you, you have won your brother. But if he does not listen to you, take one or two more with you, so that by the mouth of two or three witnesses every fact may be confirmed. If he refuses to listen to them, tell it to the church; and if he refuses to listen even to the church, let him be to you as a Gentile and a tax collector. Truly I say to you, whatever you bind on earth shall have been bound in heaven; and whatever you loose on earth shall have been loosed in heaven.” (emphasis added)

“If your brother sins…” We know from Romans 4:15 and 5:13 that by definition, sin is a violation of God’s Law. Which cannot be changed. The power to bind and loose did not give the Church the authority to re-define what sin was.
Now… a reasonable person will notice there was nothing about succession or a clerical hierarchy or infallibility or anything like that in the text. In fact, there is zero support for any of that in Scripture. But you also have to keep in mind that these are the same people who had control of the Scriptures and the laity didn’t have access to them. It’s no surprise that they got away with it for a long, long time, but the fundamental questions remain unanswered.
Do the churchians have the authority to change the Law of Moses and the Prophets?
Wrong question.
Did Jesus have the capacity to give the church the authority to do something that He could not do? In other words, did Jesus have the capacity to authorize His church to:
  • Lie, claiming Jesus created a clerical hierarchy?
  • To add to the Law?
  • To subtract from the Law?
  • To claim the Law had passed away?
  • To redefine marriage as one man and only one woman?
  • To claim “sex does not make you married”?
  • To usurp the authority of husbands and fathers?
  • To claim they were “infallible”?
They do not have the authority to claim their tradition is the equal or superior to Scripture. Jesus condemned that behavior:

“‘But in vain do they worship Me,
Teaching as doctrines the precepts of men.’“

The story of how all this happened is fascinating.
  1. First came the spread of the Gospel and the conversion of many. The faith in Jesus Christ took root and grew.
  2. The Nicolaitans gained power within the church and took control over the laity.
  3. Eventually the persecutions began and Christians were persecuted and martyred.
  4. Then Christianity got official status and the Christians became part of the Roman Government. As time went by they got real power in the government.
  5. The government began persecuting the pagans and “heretics” who didn’t agree with the Christians.
  6. The smart pagans and heretics looked around, saw which way the wind was blowing and joined the church.
  7. Two of the most influential of these were the sexual perverts Augustine and Jerome. They hated sex with a passion and their ideas about the wickedness of sex got enshrined into doctrine, causing the Biblical instruction about sex and marriage to be thrown out.
  8. The churchian clergy became very powerful following the fall of Rome. Filled with arrogance and pride, they decided they should rule the world.
  9. Churchians adopted the idea that men and women were equal and must both be held to the same standard of sexual morality. They created the doctrine of sexual equalism, which is the moral foundation of feminism.
  10. The churchians decided to control the nobility with the long-game control of marriage and sexuality. They usurped the authority of fathers and husbands, claiming the authority to regulate not only marriage but even the marital bed.
  11. A huge political fight caused a split between the east and west with the Catholics in Rome and the Orthodox in Constantinople each claiming they were the “real” church.
  12. The churchians made up lots more strange rules about sex and made it difficult to marry in their attempts to break up the noble dynasties, while owning and running the largest network of brothels in Europe.
  13. The churchians got so drunk with power that they caused the “Protestant Reformation” and lost control.
  14. The state stepped in and took control of marriage and sexual morality.
  15. The enlightenment happened and science was enthroned, the theory of evolution was advanced as the scientific answer to the churchian garbage.
  16. Democracy and women’s suffrage was adopted.
  17. Women got political power and went crazy, evolution was adopted as the new religion.
  18. Artificial hormonal birth control was developed, allowing unrestrained hypergamy.
  19. Divorce laws were changed making it easier, eventually no-fault divorce was allowed.
  20. In the midst of the collapse of Western Civilization, Churchians are still preaching that Jesus loves you, God forgives you, sex doesn’t make you married- there must be a ceremony, and don’t forget to tithe!
Someday I should create a stand-up comedy routine with that material. A comedy club is the only place such truth could possibly be publicly spoken today.

So, Where Does That Leave Us?

God judges nations for their behavior and it behooves those who desire to rebuild the west to understand that actions have consequences.
Idolatry. Churchians constantly focus on how anything can be an idol. Money, sex, drugs, fame, whatever. And in the midst of all that an astute observer will notice they always leave out the sine qua non of idolatry- the denial that the Lord God is our Creator and we as His creation have an obligation to obey Him. The astute observer will notice the churchians leave the subject of evolution strictly alone. The general theory of evolution says there is no God, which makes it the religion of secular humanism.
The west, today, is an idolatrous society. Why? Because the Men of the West have not addressed the lies of the idolaters. The truth is the general theory of evolution requires far more faith to believe in than Christianity.
Sexual Immorality. Between the epidemic of adultery that was caused by the church and the feminism that was created by the church, we also have the glorification of male homosexuality and an all-out effort to destroy the white race through miscegenation. What the Bible says about how a marriage begins is clear and the historical record is likewise clear that the early Patristic writers such as Augustine, Jerome and Gregory threw out the Biblical standard of marriage in favor of a blend of Pagan belief, Stoic philosophy and Roman law.
The west, today, is a sexually immoral society. Why? Because just like in the days of King Josiah, the truth has been hidden and replaced by lies. We have no king to command that God’s Law be obeyed, but there is nothing to stop Men of the West from attacking the lies with truth.
Yet, God does not sit back and do nothing. In the following post we will look at what God has said about this and what God is doing today. No, this isn’t end-times stuff (a student of the Bible will realize immediately that the West plays no part in the end times…). Does the West continue to thumb its nose at God? Or shall the West turn back to God?
At this point, the question is not whether blood will be spilled; the question is how much blood will be spilled and who will remain standing when the killing stops.

Theology For Men of the West: Churchian’s Aways Lie

Artisanal Toad15 Comments
Commenter Feeriker nailed it:

It speaks volumes that your challenges to the churchian loudmouths to refute your points, Sola Scriptura, have so far gone unanswered. Expect more of the usual doubling down on the extra-Scriptural nonsense in response.

Churchians don’t like what God’s Word says in general, but more than that, they do not like what God’s word does not say. The aptly named commenter Don Quixote is an excellent example and the recent exchange with that person is an excellent example of the fact that Churchians are religious SJW’s. They always lie, they always double down and they always project.
The family is the foundation of all society and there is an all-out war on family that started with churchians who created the adultery epidemic. The battle to destroy the family continues to this day with churchians striving to give feminism the moral strength and backing that it needs to destroy men, women, families and children.

Why does Don Quixote hate children?

The churchian doctrine of sexual equality based on the claim of only one standard of sexual morality for both men and women is the moral foundation of feminism. Commenter Don Quixote is standing in the gap, defending the foundation of feminism with his attempts to re-define the definition of adultery.
We’re supposed to get the impression that it must take a feminist village to produce an idiot like Don… and Lord only knows what they did to him. An outside observer might think Don is one of the walking wounded from the war on men… one of the brain-damaged variety.
Actually, his arguments are designed to confuse while sliding home a very sophisticated set of points. He plays the part of a “full Gospel” buffoon but in reality our Don Quixote is an intelligent churchian feminist who fully supports the destruction of families, marriages… and children.

Playing The Part of the Village Idiot

It is impossible to have a rational discourse with the Village Idiot because he has an agenda. The objective truth of what the Bible says is meaningless because his goal is to redefine the Bible into the feminist vision of what it should be, which allows them to destroy men, marriages and children at will.
After seeing his arguments destroyed a year ago, Don worked hard to put his arguments back together and he’s now out to re-define the definition of adultery. Moses said that if a man found some “indecency” in his wife, he could divorce her, but Moses did not define what indecency meant. By the time Jesus had His earthly ministry there was a school of thought that said burning a husband’s breakfast was sufficiently indecent to justify divorce.
Jesus provided the definition of what indecency was, when He defined it as sexual immorality and stated that was the only reason a woman could be legitimately divorced. Our village idiot is well aware of that, but he has an agenda that involves furthering the goals of feminism.
Observe what our village idiot is doing. First, he’s confronted with his completely incoherent and wrong argument that Jesus taught marriage to any divorced woman is adultery. I took the bait and gave him a lot of line.
The inconvenient truth is that adultery is defined in the Law and that definition is set in stone. Don leads with a lie, making the implicit claim that other definitions of adultery exist. Then he makes an outrageous claim that paints him as something of a conservative fundamentalist (he isn’t, he’s a feminist churchian through and through).
Don KNOWS his claim that marrying “any” divorced woman is adultery is ridiculous. So, why is he making this absurd argument? Because his argument is a lot more subtle than you’d think. Observe:
Forget the dialectic, Don goes straight for churchian rhetoric with a bit of linguistic sleigh of hand. Adultery is a PHYSICAL ACT that is a betrayal by virtue of the ACT. Without the physical act of adultery there is no adultery.
The entire goal of Don’s argument is to gain acceptance that “adultery includes betrayal” because from that point onward, adultery can be defined as betrayal. But what does that mean? It means anything feminists want it to mean because the term is completely undefined in the same way Moses did not define “indecency”. What did Jesus do? He taught that “indecency” was “sexual immorality” and explained that God would not accept a divorce for anything other than that.
  • Adultery is the act of a man having sex with another man’s wife.
  • The act of adultery is a betrayal of the marriage by the woman.
  • A betrayal of marital trust is not adultery without the act of adultery.
  • The crime of adultery requires a married woman.
What if we put this slightly differently? Who would argue that someone could be guilty of murder without killing anyone?
  • Murder is the act of willfully killing a person without just cause.
  • The act of murder is a very bad thing.
  • Doing bad things is not murder without someone’s unjust death.
  • The crime of murder requires someone to die.
The secondary benefit of this argument is to convince others that Don is not a feminist churchian. “Why, no feminist would ever claim that marrying any divorced woman is adultery! Don must be an ultra-conservative! But, he does have a point, adultery is a betrayal.”
Adultery is specifically defined in Scripture at Leviticus 18:20 and 20:10. Adultery is the crime of a married woman having sexual intercourse with a man who is not her husband. This is beyond dispute. A betrayal of marital trust is not adultery and cannot be adultery until that betrayal of marital trust is marked by the physical act of adultery. Which requires a married woman to have sexual intercourse with a man who is not her husband.
Don, your village is looking for you. Go home.

Theology For Men of the West: Adultery

Artisanal Toad26 Comments

Churchians tell lies… it’s what they do.

What Is Adultery?

Adultery in its most simple form, is the crime that occurs when a married woman has sex with a man who is not her husband. It is written:

 

You shall not have intercourse with your neighbor’s wife, to be defiled with her. Leviticus 18:20

 

and

 

If there is a man who commits adultery with another man’s wife, one who commits adultery with his friend’s wife, the adulterer and the adulteress shall surely be put to death. Leviticus 20:10

 

Adultery Requires A Married Woman

Without a married woman there can be no adultery, which brings an entirely new meaning to the word “lust” that churchians love to toss around. Jesus said

 

You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall not commit adultery’; but I say to you that everyone who looks at a woman with lust for her has already committed adultery with her in his heart. Matthew 5:27-28

 

Lust is adultery in the heart and adultery requires a married woman, so can a man look on an eligible woman with lust? No. It is not possible to commit adultery with an unmarried woman so likewise it is not possible to lust after an unmarried woman. So, according to Scripture, a boy that’s fapping to fantasies about the virgin girl next door is not lusting after her because she’s not married and he’s not in sin. If he starts fantasizing about the girl’s mother (assuming she’s married), that’s lust and according to Jesus he’s already committed adultery in his heart.

The Relationship Between Marriage and Adultery

In the act of taking the woman’s virginity the eligible man has taken her in marriage. Therefore, any woman who is not a virgin is (in approximately the order of occurrence):
  • A married woman (the vast, vast majority of all adult women)
  • A widow (more common than you might imagine).
  • A woman divorced by her non-Christian husband for her adultery.
  • A Christian woman whose non-Christian husband abandoned her.
  • A woman who is not a virgin but was never married because the man was ineligible.
This is where it gets tricky, so pay attention.
The last point on the list was the woman who is not a virgin (she has had sexual intercourse) but was not married with that act because the man was not eligible to marry her. A man who was a close relative that committed incest with her did not marry her because that is forbidden. A man who the woman’s father had forbidden to marry her is not eligible to marry her and the sex does not make her married. As I’ve written previously, this offers a way out for women who are married and don’t know it.
First, Numbers 30:5 says the father has the authority to forbid any agreement his daughter makes, in the day he hears of it. There is no time limit on this, but the authority of the father to forbid his daughters agreements only applies when she is in her youth and living in his house. If, while she was in her youth and living in her fathers house, the girl gave her agreement to have sex with a man (which could be as simple as lifting her ass so he could pull her pants off), her father has the authority to forbid that agreement in the day he hears of it. Which means that the sex did not create a marriage.
There is no time limit on when the father can do this, which has the effect of creating an interesting situation that I wrote about in Modern Women- Schrodinger’s Cats. If she qualifies, seven words from her father is all it takes. If not, the next step is to ask whether the man in question is still alive. If he’s dead, she’s a widow as of the moment he died. If he’s alive, the question is whether he is a Christian. Because Christian men are forbidden to divorce their wives. If the man is not a Christian he can give her a certificate of divorce because of her adultery.

Applying Scripture To The Real World

Let’s say a Jane gave Fred her virginity (was married to him) when she was 16 and living at home. She later broke up with “boyfriend” Fred and had sex with many other men through the rest of her teenage years and during college. Eventually she got married to Robert (a Christian man who was a really nice guy) and later divorced him because she was unhappy. Jane has now discovered just how badly she’s screwed up her life and she has several choices in terms of how she should deal with this.
Currently she’s still married to Fred and all the other men have been cases of adultery.
  • In the day her father hears of it, if he forbids it, she was not married to Fred. Because she was not a virgin and not married, she did not commit adultery with any of the other men she had sex with. When she had her wedding with Robert she was actually married to him because she agreed to be married and regardless of what some state court judge says, she is still married to Robert because she had no authority to divorce him. He, as a Christian man, is not authorized to divorce her for any reason.
  • If non-Christian Fred gives her a certificate of divorce, today, she is no longer married but she has a long track record of adultery. She was never married to Robert because at the time they had their wedding ceremony she was married to Fred, so her so-called divorce from Robert was just a formal break-up of an adulterous liaison.
  • If Fred is a Christian he is forbidden to divorce her. But, is he really a Christian? In 1st John 2 we are taught that someone who claims to be a Christian but does not keep His commandments is a liar. Fred is required to live with his wife and love her as Christ loves the Church. And to provide for her. So, when she shows up and he won’t do what he’s commanded to do, she can considered herself “abandoned” by her non-Christian husband.
Some might consider that legalism, but is it? God said to do things a certain way and He provided a few specific provisions to deal with problems. It would be amusing were it not so sad, but the same churchians who would object to the idea the women were married when they gave some man their virginity would then object that God provided a few ways out of that mess. Which was caused by the lies the churchians have taught for generations.

Gaming The System

Where this gets really interesting is that if Jane gets her father to forbid her marriage to Fred, she’s still married to Robert and has only been married to Robert. If she gets Fred to give her a certificate of divorce (or abandon her), she was never married to Robert, she was committing adultery with him. And, since as a Christian she is forgiven of her adultery, her only real issue is to stop committing adultery. So, does she want to be married to Robert?
What if Jane is still married to Robert but is unhappy and doesn’t want to be married to him any longer? If Daddy solves the problem she’s married to Robert. However, if she leaves Robert because it’s an adulterous relationship and legally divorces him she isn’t doing anything wrong. Then, when Fred gives her a certificate of divorce she’s no longer bound to Fred and she’s free.
Think it won’t happen? Consider Dalrock’s epic post “Why so many wives wish their husband would cheat“ (Archive; PDF).

The Reasons Churchians HATE This

One might ask, why would a “single” woman want to end a marriage she doesn’t know about, that she doesn’t believe she has? Suffer the embarrassment of confessing to her father in order to get him to forbid her marriage she didn’t know about? Get a certificate of divorce from the guy who got her virginity, to end a marriage neither one of them knew about? People will think she joined a cult!
Because of the attractiveness of the man and the power of her rationalization hamster.
If said woman is highly attracted to the man, she will do this for him. Get Daddy to say seven words? Not a problem, especially if she knows he walks if she won’t do it. And later when they have sex it will not be a sin. Thus, you could say that the man has a sexual motive for ensuring she is eligible to marry, because as soon as she’s eligible to marry she’s legitimately fair game for sex. Without sin.
Oh- and there goes the whole “sex outside of marriage is always a sin” doctrine. Oops.
How many unhappy women are there in the church who are not really married to the man they think they are married to? What happens when they are taught the truth? Some of them will need to separate because they have a husband who would like for them to come home and they’re living in adultery. However, the issue of the unintentional marriage caused by all the lies can be fixed in the vast majority of cases. The problem is that many of the women would love to have a reason to get out of the marriage they’re in. Again, I refer the reader to Dalrock’s post about that (Archived Version; PDF Version). Does anyone think this situation has gotten better in the past five years?
Doing something about the epidemic of adultery means acknowledging that sex with a virgin makes her married. It also requires admitting there is a double-standard of sexual morality that says women can only have sex with their husband but their husband is not limited to sex with only his wife. He could legitimately be banging the babysitter. He can legitimately have multiple wives.
Worst of all, the churchian leaders would be forced to admit that for generations everyone in the congregation has been lied to and for generations everything they taught about sex and marriage was a lie. Well, two things were true, men and women are not to commit adultery and men are not to have sex with prostitutes. But even a stopped clock is right twice a day. Churchians will not change because it’s all about money, power and control.

Then How Will This Change Occur?

It is well known that your not-so-humble Toad is a complete asshole. I have been challenging churchians for years to refute me from the Bible. If I was wrong it should be rather simple to refute me by laying out what the Bible actually says. That hasn’t happened because what I’m writing here is the truth. Like it or not, this is the truth.
Churchian teachers will not stop lying or doubling down on their lies. The idea that so-called “leaders” in the church will start teaching what the Bible actually says is laughable.
The change will only occur when men learn the truth of what Scripture says and become high-value men who are fit to rule over women. They must become the man that women will call their father for. After that happens and the women are eligible to marry, the men can enjoy the fruit of their labor. As strange as it sounds, calling such a thing a ministry is far more appropriate than the “ministry” of standing in a pulpit and telling folks that Jesus loves them and God forgives them, so have a great time of fellowship and don’t forget to tithe!
I can just imagine the screams of outrage that will center on the false belief that sex outside of marriage is a sin. Those who think it’s a sin should avail themselves of Toad’s Churchian Challenge. In the meanwhile, what about not binding the mouths of the ox that treads the grain? Isn’t the worker worthy of his hire? And if he gets paid in kind rather than in cash, so what? There is no sin.
Then comes the question: what if she wants to marry the man? I will be covering that in a future post, but the answer is simple. A man consents and commits to marriage with the act of penetration so he should not be having sex with any woman he isn’t interested in marrying. Given that she’s not a virgin, she has to agree to marriage before it’s a marriage. The question is whether she agrees to be married and how she might go about doing that.
In my studied opinion, men who want a reasonably safe marriage today with some hope they’ll be able to raise their children to adulthood without having them stolen should get married to at least two women at the same time using a contract, live in the same house with them and share the same bed. I’ll be explaining that in detail in a future post, which might just surprise the MGTOW brigade.

Theology For Men of the West: Biblical Marriage

Artisanal Toad27 Comments

Marriage Monogamy Monopoly

Modern Monogamy is Monopoly for Women
In the first post of this series, we saw that Man was created by God from the dust of the ground. However, it was not good for man to be alone, so God took a rib from Adam and created Eve. She was created to be a helper to him, to help him accomplish his mission.
The Mission of Man (Genesis 1:28) states:

 

God blessed them; and God said to them, “Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth, and subdue it; and rule over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the sky and over every living thing that moves on the earth.”

 

The Law of Marriage (Genesis 2:24) states:

 

“For this reason a man shall leave his father and his mother, and be joined to his wife; and they shall become one flesh.”

 

It seems hard to believe, but that verse became the centerpiece of the war against the nobility that was waged by the church in the Middle Ages. The result was all the lies that were told became entrenched in the culture, which is how we got this travesty called modern marriage.

Modern Marriage

According to Churchians, marriage requires a third party to “solemnize” or “officiate” the marriage and claim the marriage is by the act of mutual consent before witnesses. As a rule they generally believe that marriage also requires a license from the state. Following consent in which the couple is “married” with the permission and consent of a third party, sex is considered the “consummation” of the marriage. Churchians believe that sex is only allowed following such a ceremony and indeed, churchians claim that sex is only moral and licit when it occurs within a marital union.
The modern ideal of marriage is one man with one woman, til divorce do they part (or annulment among certain groups), a union of enforced monogamy for as long as it may last and to hell with the kids who get destroyed in the process of divorce. The standard of commitment is the same for both husband and wife- strict monogamy until it ends. Churchians claim that any “cheating” on the part of either the husband or wife is adultery and therefore grounds for divorce. Not that grounds are even needed now that no-fault divorce allows divorce for any reason or even no reason at all.
There are no modern standards of eligibility other than a restriction on the marriage of close relatives and a prohibition on multiple (state sanctioned) marriages. While historically only a man could be charged with bigamy (the crime of having more than one licensed concurrent marriage), recently women have been getting charged with bigamy as well. Standards no longer even require a man and woman because modern marriage now includes monogamous homosexual unions in addition to heterosexual unions.
How this situation came about is a long story filled with lies, political intrigue and the pursuit of power at any cost by the rulers of the church from about 600 to 1100 AD. It should be pointed out that Wizard’s First Rule states “People are stupid. They will believe a lie because they either want it to be true or fear it to be true.” The most amazing thing is that not just churchians but pretty much everyone believes this shit.
“Men and women are equal.”
That is complete bullshit, but people believe in this shit the same way they believe in evolution. By faith. Rather than deconstruct it, it’s easier to simply explain the truth. Keep in mind as you read this- Satan hates mankind and this goes all the way to the original mission of man. Attack the man and you attack the family. Attack the family and you attack the next generation, the future. Destroy the family and you have destroyed everything. The future belongs to those who show up for it.
Men of the West… this is the most important issue you face because this fight is over your posterity. Those who will inherit what you have done.

The Biblical Christian Marriage

Genesis 2:24 is the Law of Marriage. This is actually pretty simple.

Sex Is How The Virgin Is Married

The man was authorized by God to begin marriage because marriage begins the family and family is the container in which children are to be brought into this world. That is truth. Children need both their biological mother and father working together to raise them. Children need both their parents to work together to raise them. So, how does this begin?
First is the change in status as the man leaves and goes out from under the authority of his father and mother to be the head of his own house. The man has sexual intercourse with the eligible virgin and she becomes his wife. When this occurs, According to Jesus (Matthew 19:4-6), it is God who makes the two “one flesh” in a spiritual joining that the Apostle Paul said was the same as the spiritual joining that makes the Christian a member of the body of Christ (Ephesians 5:28-32). It is a great mystery. Thus, the “one flesh” portion of Genesis 2:24 is the spiritual joining that is the act of God and cannot be the act of man. This act of God occurs when the man penetrates his wife and they have sexual intercourse, but “becoming one flesh” is not sex.
All women are virgins when they marry. The act of penetrative sexual intercourse with the virgin is what begins a marriage and Scripture does not require any other act, which is why the woman who was sold by her father to be a concubine (Exodus 21:7-10), the woman who was captured in battle (Deuteronomy 21:10-14) and even the woman who was raped (Deuteronomy 22:28-29) were all married with that act. News Flash: the virgin’s consent is not required. This means whether she knew she was being married or not, whether she wanted to be married or not, with that act she is married. And the Churchians will screech over this, but Scripture is clear what the words of the text mean because the Apostle Paul showed us.

The Consequences of Sex = Marriage

The problem the churchians have with that is they look around and realize they didn’t get their wife’s virginity… which means she isn’t their wife. She’s not their wife because she was already a married woman, which means they are living in adultery. The truth is in any given church at least 80% of all the couples you see are not actually married, they’re living in adultery.
Then, after generations of lies, they have the audacity to say “I cannot believe God would create a situation that required all those marriages be broken up.” News flash: God didn’t create this situation, the people who lied and said “sex does not make you married” are the ones who created this. Even then, God provided a way out.
The father has the authority to forbid the virgin’s agreement to marry that man (which is what her agreement to have sex with him actually was) and in forbidding that agreement, the man is no longer eligible to marry her. Thus, the sex did not make her married because he was not eligible to marry her. That is the power of the father over his daughter, which the church usurped from men well over a thousand years ago.
Man was given the authority to initiate marriage, but not given the authority to end the marriage he began. We know this because of what Jesus said in Matthew 19:3-9. Moses permitted men to divorce their wives if the woman committed sexual immorality, but according to Jesus, “from the beginning it has not been this way.” The only way we get “no divorce” from Genesis 2:24 is to recognize that it was a grant of authority to the man to initiate marriage but it contained no authority to end marriage. Much later in 1st Corinthians 7:10-11 the Lord Jesus Christ re-instituted the standard of Genesis 2:24 (no divorce) for His married servants, but we’ll cover that later.
In addition to the fact that the man was not given the authority to end a marriage once he began it, the man was not restricted to a single wife. Even though the majority of men have only one wife, they are not restricted to one wife and thus by definition marriage does not mean monopoly for the woman. The husband always has the right to take another wife and the current wife’s permission is not needed.
The standard for commitment for Christian marriage is thus:
  • The man makes a permanent but not exclusive commitment to the wife.
  • The woman makes a permanent and exclusive commitment to her husband.
A man begins a marriage to a virgin with the act of penetration (sexual intercourse) and with that act he gives his consent and commitment to the marriage. The virgin is automatically married by that act, provided the man was eligible to marry her, because she has no agency as a virgin. Unlike a virgin, a widow or a legitimately divorced woman has agency. She must agree to be married before the act of intercourse will make her married. That’s rather confusing to many, but I will be covering the issues surrounding the eligibility of non-virgins in my upcoming post on sexual morality.

The Churchian Hot Button: Polygyny

“Nobody Gets Married To Sleep Alone…”
First of all, why bring up polygyny? Because one cannot talk about marriage without discussing the issue of divorce and the issue of polygyny and divorce are intertwined. One cannot discuss one without the other when looking at the standards of commitment.
The only question with regard to polygyny is whether God changes. The answer is no, He does not. By His own testimony He does not change and neither does the Lord Jesus Christ. The mission was given to man to be fruitful and multiply. That is a command and contrary to popular belief, getting married and having children is an obligation God placed upon all of mankind.
God created marriage and nowhere in the Bible is monogamy or polygamy mentioned. There is only marriage. All men have the option of taking more than one wife and that means while he might only have one wife, she does not have a monopoly on him.
The following rules of marriage were written as part of the “50 Shades of Marriage” post in which I made the point that modern marriage is so screwed up by feminism that the Bible’s rules for marriage sound a lot like the contract for a BDSM style D/s relationship. Which is probably why the books/movies “50 Shades of Grey” are so popular. Women want a masculine, dominant man and modern marriage castrates men by putting the wife in power over them.

The Bible’s Rules For the D/s
Relationship Called Marriage:

  1. The act of penetrative sexual intercourse is required to begin the relationship. If the woman is a virgin sex automatically begins the relationship. If she is not a virgin but otherwise eligible, she must agree to the relationship prior to the sex initiating the relationship. (Genesis 2:24 as defined by 1st Corinthians 6:16)
  2. The commitment standard of the man is permanent, which means that once given he cannot rescind his commitment (regardless of her behavior). His commitment is non-exclusive, which means that at his discretion he may bring other women into the relationship at any time. (Genesis 2:24)
  3. The commitment standard of the woman is permanent and she is bound to her man for as long as he lives. Her commitment is exclusive, which means that he is her one and only. Sex with any other man is the crime of adultery (Romans 7:2-3).
  4. The relationship between the man and women is one of master-servant, or ruler-subject. The man is to rule his women and has complete authority over them, over every aspect of their lives, in everything. (Genesis 3:16, Numbers 30, Ephesians 5, 1st Peter 2-3)
  5. The man is required to love his women. This love is defined as holding them accountable for good behavior and requiring their obedience. When they transgress he is required to rebuke and discipline them (Hebrews 12:5-11, Revelation 3:19).
  6. Part of this accountability is his obligation to review any and every agreement she makes with others. If he desires he may say nothing and let it stand but if he does not like it he is to forbid it in the day he hears of it (Numbers 30).
  7. The woman is to submit to her man in everything, no exceptions (Ephesians 5:22-24).
  8. Her submission is not dependent on her opinion of his behavior or his actual behavior. If the man is displaying bad behavior the woman is to submit to him without a word and win him over with her quiet and chaste conduct (1st Peter 3:1-6).
  9. Sex is to be on demand and the woman’s body belongs to the man. Likewise, the man is to ensure the women’s sexual needs are met (1st Corinthians 7:4, Exodus 21:10).
  10. Sexual activity such as masturbation, oral, vaginal or anal is all at the discretion of the man inasmuch as none of these things are forbidden in any way (Ephesians 5:22-24).
  11. The woman is required to live with her man in order that he might meet his responsibility to hold her accountable for her behavior (1st Peter 3:7, 1st Corinthians 7:10).
  12. If the woman chooses to violate requirement #11 and leave her man, she is to remain single (chaste) or be reconciled to her man (1st Corinthians 7:10-11).
  13. If the woman has left her man in violation of these rules, she still retains the right of return. If she returns in complete submission to him, the man is required to accept her return to the relationship and cannot refuse to be reconciled to her (1st Corinthians 7:11, 1st Peter 3:7).
  14. The women are not required to love their man but they are required to respect him, obey him and submit to him (Genesis 3:16, Numbers 30, Ephesians 5, 1st Peter 3:1-2).
  15. Women are encouraged to call their man “Master” without being frightened by any fear (1st Peter 3:6).
  16. As part of the women’s requirement to respect their man, it is appropriate to treat him as if they were enlisted persons and he was a commissioned officer. Call him “Sir” and be respectful in language and posture, as well as giving an appropriate “salute” such as a bow of the head or kiss on the cheek when that is appropriate.
  17. Women belong to their man and are required to remain faithful to him, although masturbation and sexual activity with other women are allowed at his discretion.
  18. The man may have sex with any woman outside the relationship that he is eligible to marry, except for prostitutes.
  19. The women must not have vaginal intercourse while they are menstruating (Leviticus 18:19).
  20. Vaginal intercourse is forbidden following childbirth for a period of 40 days if the child was a boy and 80 days for a girl (Leviticus 12).
  21. Any other rules are negotiable or at the discretion of the husband.
Lessons? Too many to count. This is the heart of what Men of the West must know.

Theology For Men of the West: Heaven, Hell, Angels and Demons

Artisanal Toad5 Comments

Geography Lesson

As soon as you can recognize there is a God and you read His Word, you come to grips with the fact that we aren’t the only players on this field. Mankind is not the first of God’s creations and we’re told that angels do indeed exist because God created them to serve Him. Nor is the earth the only plane of existence.
There is a place called Heaven, which is God’s home. There is a place called Hell, a place of eternal torment which is reserved for the punishment of those who are condemned by God to punishment. Hell is the place of eternal death and separation from God. One cannot accept that Heaven exists without the accepting that Hell exists. There is (or was) a place called Sheol, the place of the dead. All of these places are mentioned in the Bible.
There is also earth, which is the home of mankind. According to the final chapters in the book, we learn that Heaven is not our home- Heaven is God’s home. Christians will not spend eternity in Heaven because there will be a new earth and a new city of Jerusalem. That is the eternal home of those who have eternal life.

Others…

Satan (also called Lucifer) was one of the greatest of the angels, one of the Cherubim, one of the angels who covered and guarded the Throne of God. He rebelled against God. When he did, about a third of the angels rebelled with him. These are known as demons and Lucifer is known as the “Prince of the Power of the Air” and the “Prince of Demons.” We don’t know that much about him other than a few references here and there. The dialogue in the beginning of the book of Job raises as many questions as it answers, as well as the statement of Jesus that He saw Satan fall like lightning from Heaven.
The Bible tells us very little about Angels and Demons, but does tell us just enough for history to be filled with speculation of what people imagine Angels and Demons are like. One interesting aspect of this is to sexualize everything related to angels, often casting them as female.
Three points can be seen as to the sexuality of angels. First, the Bible describes angels (and by the same token, demons) as male. They are always described as male and there are no examples of female angels. Three Angles are mentioned by name, Michael, Gabriel and Satan. No others are named. This does not mean there are no female angels, although the implications of female angels is enough to drive most Churchians quite mad.
Second, when the Sadducees questioned Jesus about the Levirate marriage in the resurrection, He responded saying that in the resurrection people will be like angels and there will be no giving or taking in marriage. That does not say what many might think it says because we know nothing of Heaven and the way Angels are there. Not only that, but very few today understand the relationship between sex and marriage.
The popular interpretation is there’s no sex in heaven because Angels don’t have sex. That is an assumption because Angels could just as easily not be able to reproduce. Without children there is no purpose for marriage. As for men and women in the resurrection, if there is no marriage there can be no adultery and any male could have sex with any female. And we still know very little about Angels, so IF there are female Angels the implication is Angels were created male and female for a reason, which might include sex.
This returns us to the original question of the Sadducees, which of the woman’s husbands would have authority over her? The answer Jesus gave was that it won’t be that way in the resurrection, there will be no giving and taking in marriage. Which says absolutely nothing about sex.
Third, the record is clear that rather than being neuters (and in support of the previous point), male Angels of one variety or another (Son’s of God) found the daughters of man to be attractive and the children of such unions were the Nepthalim- powerful and mighty men of renown. Male Angels can definitely procreate with the daughters of man.
I will admit that Zechariah 5 might describe two angels who were female, but it’s the sort of passage that an imaginative person can interpret any way they want. I will also admit that I have had my own speculation as to angels and demons. It is an intriguing subject.
Later we will be covering issues of the Christian’s power over demons and spirits, but at this point I mention the fact that Angels and Demons are real and must be recognized as real by the same authority that recognizes that Heaven and Hell are real. Both of them have an impact on our world in ways we can seldom comprehend.
Lesson #5: There cannot be Heaven without the presence of Hell. There is a Heaven, which is the home of God. There is a Hell, which is the place of eternal punishment. There is earth, which is the home of mankind and will be renewed one day.
Lesson #6: Satan is real, Angels are real and Demons are real… They are just as real as the Lord God and the Lord Jesus Christ.

Theology For Men of the West

Artisanal Toad5 Comments
(The Alt-West needs a moral anchor. We do not need an “Alt-Christianity” because that implies there is more than one type of Christianity. God’s Word does not change, all that is needed is a return to what God’s Word actually says. God’s requirements for all of Mankind do not change, the truth needs to be told. This series will begin that process)

Men of the West

It is self-evident: there is a God who created the Heavens and the Earth. God, our Creator, communicated with us and left us with His Word, known as the Bible. The Bible provides us with God’s requirements for Mankind. It is the obligation of Mankind to obey the commands of the Lord God.
The Bible testifies as to its own authenticity and is very much a “take it or leave it” proposition. Interestingly, while even churchian cucks have always been able to defend the Bible against all attacks, they cannot defend their own lies about the Bible. Don’t like what the Bible says? Reject it and move on. The attempts to “re-interpret” God’s Word are merely evidence that it’s true because otherwise those who don’t like what it says would simply move on and do something different.
God is not a God of confusion. He said what He meant and He meant what He said. One does not need an advanced degree from a seminary in order to understand God’s Word. Understanding the Bible requires study, but the Bible was meant to be understood. God’s Word is coherent and God’s Word is true. What the Bible says cannot be denied, but just as importantly what the Bible does not say cannot be denied. The Bible is not contradictory and the entire Bible must agree with itself.

The Story of the Bible

The story of the Bible is simple. Following creation, Man violated God’s command and thereby sinned, causing a separation between God and Man. God first instructed Man, then later gave Mankind His Law. The Apostle Paul stated that while sin was in the world, until God gave His Law, there was no violation. Sin was not imputed because until there is a transgression no sin is imputed (Romans 4:15 and 5:13).
While there is a tendency to “spiritualize” what the Bible says, God is very clear that He takes a hand in the affairs of Mankind. Individuals will be subject to judgment at the end of time, but God judges nations temporally. Those nations that honor Him and obey Him are blessed, those nations that do not honor Him or obey Him are cursed.
The wages of sin is death, but God’s innocent Son was sent here to die, once for all of mankind. The free gift of God is eternal life through the act of Jesus, who is the Son of God. We know this is true because in accordance with prophesy, He was raised from the dead after 3 days and appeared to many witnesses over a period of time before He ascended bodily into heaven.
Following the ascension into Heaven of Jesus, now known as the Christ, His chosen Disciples (Apostles) wrote what is known as the New Testament. The New Testament contained the Gospels of Christ, the history of the early church and letters of instruction in the “house rules” for the servants of Christ (Christians). The last living Apostle (John) wrote the final communication of Christ to His churches (seven of them) as well as prophesies about the end of time.

He’s Not Your Boyfriend Jesus

Christians do not have a peculiar religion, they have what is known as a faith or a relationship, but this is better stated as a peculiar status. Christians are slaves who were purchased with the shed blood of Christ. They are property and they have a Master who has the authority to command them. Because they have the status of slaves within the household of their Master, their master’s righteousness is imputed to them. Their sin is forgiven because He paid the price for them. He paid a debt He did not owe because we owed a debt we could not pay.
The New Testament contains a litmus test for Christianity, obedience:

The one who says, “I have come to know Him,” and does not keep His commandments, is a liar, and the truth is not in him; but whoever keeps His word, in him the love of God has truly been perfected. By this we know that we are in Him: the one who says he abides in Him ought himself to walk in the same manner as He walked.

The later history of the Christianity details the political machinations involved in the struggle for power between various factions of Nicolaitans within the church. Those who taught things Christ hated. Most relevant to us today is after the Nicolaitans took control, basic teachings of the Bible were disregarded and covered up; to be replaced by a combination of Pagan beliefs, Stoic philosophy and Roman law.
One of the interesting features of God’s Law was that once written it could not be changed. To add to the Law or to subtract from the Law is a violation of the Law. Jesus testified that the Law would not change and would not pass away until all things were accomplished. In making that testimony Jesus was stating He did not have the authority to change the Law.
Keep in mind that Jesus said “a slave is not greater than his master” and “a pupil is not above his teacher.” If Jesus did not have the authority to change God’s Law, neither does any Christian or group of Christians. That is a point to which we will be returning in the future but for now, we will begin at the beginning.

The Mission Of Man And Role Of Woman

God created Man from the dust of the earth and gave him a mission. The mission of man is to be fruitful and multiply, to fill the earth and subdue it, to take dominion over it. That mission was given to Adam. Later God brought all the animals to Adam to see what he would name them. He did, but a suitable helper was not to be found for the man. Then God said it was not good for man to be alone, that He would make a helper suitable for him. He put Adam into a deep sleep and taking a rib from Adam, He created Eve from Adam’s rib. She was presented to Adam and he named her woman, meaning “out from man.”
Woman was created by God, from man, for man, to be used by man as a helper in the accomplishment of his mission.
Men and women were not created equal. Man was created first and placed in charge. Woman was created later, specifically to be a helper to him under his authority. Men and women are not equal and never will be because God does not change. The coming of Christ did not alter this situation, as we shall see in great detail as we go along.
From the beginning, men and women were not created to be equal and they are not equal. Man is in the position of authority and woman is under his authority, created to be his helper. His assistant. This is indisputable fact because that is what the text says. While we now have many feminists who do not agree with that, it’s not our job to agree with God, rather, it is our job to honor, worship and obey God.
God does not expect us to agree with Him or even to understand Him:

“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways My ways,” declares the Lord.
For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are My ways higher than your ways
And My thoughts than your thoughts.”

Lesson #1: there is a God and He gave us His written Word. Contained in that Word is God’s Law. Mankind has an obligation to obey that Law.
Lesson #2: men and women are not equal. This is important to understand because it was NOT the “curse” of Genesis 3:16 that put man in charge of woman. God created woman to be a helper, not an equal; and no amount of creative interpretation will change that fact.
Lesson #3: God does not change. By His own testimony, God does not change.

That did not change with the new covenant in Christ:

Lesson #4: the change that occurred with the New Testament was the status of Christians, who are slaves within the household of Christ. It is not that the Law is done away with, as servants of Christ there are some new rules imposed by the Master on His servants.